02 / Applied artificial intelligence
Documents, understood.
Judgment, preserved.
Document intelligence that combines retrieval, structured extraction, and human review where the stakes demand it.

01 / Decision record
The reasoning
underneath the result.
- 01The constraint
- Manual review consumed thousands of person-hours each month. Keyword automation found only a fraction of the relevant content and generated too many false positives.
- 02The decision
- Combine semantic retrieval with LLM extraction and classification. Route uncertain results to a human, and track accuracy, recall, and drift through a dedicated evaluation framework.
- 03The trade-off
- Automation is not the objective at every confidence level. Keeping a review path makes uncertainty an explicit part of the system.
- 04The outcome
- Manual review fell by 90%, with 97% extraction accuracy reported across a platform processing more than ten thousand documents a day.
02 / System boundaries
Every part has
a clear responsibility.
01
Prepare
OCR & chunkingPreserve useful context
02
Retrieve
EmbeddingsFind relevant evidence
03
Extract
LLMsStructured results
04
Review
Confidence routingHuman verification
A high-level reading of the published architecture. Boundaries shown here are conceptual, not a deployment diagram.
03 / Outcomes
What changed.
90%less manual review
97%extraction accuracy
10K+documents per day
3 weeksprototype to production
Results reported in this case study. These are separate from the illustrative routing model.